Response to a Muslims Attack on Hinduism
When I used to practice Islam I purchased a book by Jamaal al-Din M. Zarabozo titled: “Purification of the Soul: Concept, Process and Means”
In this book Mr. Zarabozo starts with beliefs of religions other than Islam and their means of spiritual purification. He presents the views and then bashes them (at the same time bashing Islamic groups he disagrees with aswell). Then he goes on to present the Islamic way of Purification and why Islam is the true way of purifying the soul. My concern is responding to his objections to hinduism and slander of it. So this will be the focus of this article.
Quoting from his work on pg 13
“Hinduism is a strange combination of seeking to please a number of gods while at the same time believing there is actually only one reality called Brahman. Again, The Encyclopedia Britannica states,
The pervasive force lying within all being, Brahman is conceived as the “self,” or atman, of all forms of life, and many Hindu traditions portray the conscious realization of the identity between the individual self and the cosmic principle as the final religious goal.”
Firstly let me respond to his criticism that hinduism is trying to appease different gods while believing in One Reality which is Brahman.
Quoting from “Dancing with Siva: Hinduism’’s Contemporary Catechism” by Sivaya Subramuniyaswami
“God Siva is the Supreme Being, the Lord of lords. He alone prevails everywhere. Not an atom moves except by His will. Ganesa, Karttikeya, Indra, Agni and all the 330 million Gods of Hinduism are beings just as we are, created by Lord Siva and destined to enjoy union with Him. The Gods are souls of high evolution. They are very old and mature souls, mighty beings who live in the Sivaloka. Though neither male nor female, they may be popularly depicted as Gods and Goddesses.”
Zarabozo just like other muslims are quick to condemn what they see as idolatry, yet they do not really understand at all what they are dealing with. Firstly, we wonder if Islam is free from what they are accusing others of. According to Islam there are angels of different types that are charged with different task.
For example: there is an angel of death that takes the souls of the living.
There are angels who send down rainfall and move the clouds.
Angel Israfeel blows a trumpet to announce the day of judgement which kills those who are alive.
Angels Munkar and Nakeer question the dead in their graves.
There are angel guardians of hell and heaven.
Its strange that Zarabozo and others would criticize the gods and goddesses of Hinduism, yet not reflect that there are Angels created by Allah to move the clouds, make it rain, take souls at death, and bring punishment upon people. This reminds me of the ancient greeks and romans who believed in god of rain, god of death, and gods that punish people. Who really is the polytheist? The Muslim may argue that, “We dont worship angels and the angels are only given power by Allah and not of their ownselves”
In response I say that a fundamental of faith in Islam is belief in angels. One must believe what Allah says in the Quran and what Muhammad has said. This includes the belief of Angels being in charge of taking souls, making it rain, bringing revelation, punishing people in the grave, blowing trumpets to cause destruction to the earth and its inhabitants, and other such tasks. Secondly if you say it is Allah who gave them this power, than I can just as well defend the Hindus that may invoke different deities by saying it is the SUPREME CONSCIOUSNESS, the Infinite that has manifested those highly evolved souls and thus they have their power within the Infinite.
Zarabozo should really contemplate deeper before jumping to conclusions and using The Encyclopedia Britannica as a reference on a religion.
Now concerning Brahman.
“All this that we see in the world is Brahman”
“Brahman is absolute existence, consciousness, and Bliss”
Brahman is that Primordial Being whom we have our existence in. This Spirit manifested all things. When the Spirit expanded it condensed into what we call matter. Matter is mostly empty space as it is 9.999999999999 which means it is filled with Conscious Energy. E=MC squared demonstrates this. This consciousness expanded and more matter formed. The Reality of all things is within the existence of Brahman.
“OM is the whole of this Universe”
All energy is being given from the boundless Cosmic Intelligence. It is the Tao of the Taoist, Ultimate Reality of the Buddhist, and Brahman of the Hindus.
Since all beings are manifested from this Supreme Consciousness all have their existence in It. That means that all those Gods and Goddesses of Hinduism actually exist within Brahman and are essentially Brahman at the deepest level. Unfortunately, we cannot expect Zarabozo to understand this, because he follows a very literal view as is the norm of Islam. He follows a puritan branch of Islam that wishes to bring TRUE or original Islam to live in the world. This brings a lot of baggage with its literal interpretations. One must believe Allah is some outside being that is beyond this Universe. This Deity exist above a Throne that is above 7 heavens. He rules like a monarch midevil King. He is very picky and awards and punishes. According to a saying of Muhammad, Allah actually punished a man who did not purify himself from urine, so the man due to his finite uncleaniness experienced harsh torture by Allah’s angels.
In otherwords Allah is a King like God that is happy sometimes and Angry other times. You can only rationally believe in Allah through puzzled thinkings, but no experience of this monarch king, because it is heresy to the likes of Zarabozo and others. However, Brahman can be experienced in the Here and the NOW. This is something Islam needs to evolve into, fortunately there has been many sufi groups that have experienced this, to which Zarabozo shows displeasure to.
He states:
“This belief is essentially the same belief as that of wahdah al-wujood or monism that is found among many Sufi groups. What this means is that everything that occurs and all creatures-the evil, the despicable and the devilish-are nothing but part and parcel of that one entity that Hindus are trying to discover they are all part of. In sum, the whole of the experienced existence is nothing but illusion without any real substance save being a ’projection superimposed on the one Reality, the Brahman.” In the history of Sufism, this belief system, not surprisingly, had a horrendous effect as, when one truely claims to believe in this, all things become permissible to the person. There is no distinction between good and evil. There is no distinction between what is lawful and what is not lawful. There is not even any distinction between the object of one’s worship and adoration and the most viole part of the universe. In fact, all of those things become meaningless since everything is one and the same in the ultimate reality.”
My response to this is that it is absolutely silly to suggest that one who has a realization of Brahman or Wahdah al-wujood of the sufis (Oneness of Being) would begin to do dispicable things. A yogi or sufi who has God Realization is not going to start raping, killing, and having sex with slaves (as Muhammad himself allowed). Instead these are people who awaken into the wisdom of the Divine.
A student of the famous yogi, Paramhansa Yogananda was asking concerning Oneness and Brahman. The student was mentioning that all beings are part of God therefore why does one bother to live a good holy life. Paramhansa Yogananda mentioned to the student that in a way that is true that we are all One with God, however if you play the role of a villian in God’s cosmic dream then you will have to experience the villians punishment in the play of God’s cosmic dream.
The famous Chinese Yogi, Lao Tzu once said: “With virtue and quietness one may conquer the world.”
It is through God realization or perception of Ultimate Reality that one truely becomes what they truely are. They merge back with the Infinite, though in reality there was no merging back because they were never separate.
Yogis that have Self Realization never preach harmfulness, indulgence in sex, drinking, and other such things. Zarabozo really has no argument here.
Zarabozo later goes on to say:
“Furthermore, these are gods that are often times depicted in their scriptures as warring against each other and hating each other.” There is a footnote which says “For example, Brahma (the creator god) argued with Vishnu over who was greater only to discover that Shiva (a third god) was the supposed greatest, supremely powerful god-even though Shiva is not the creator god.”
This statement by Zarabozo just shows his ignorance of Hinduism. He should rely moreso on the words and explanation of Hindus than readeing Briticanna and writings of Ludwig. Brahma is essentially the same as Shiva and so is Vishnu. These are methporical writings. Scripture in Hinduism is not to be always taken literal as it is in Islam.
Zarabozo goes on to quote the Quran which is to be used in refutation to “polytheism”
“Allah puts forth a similitude: a [slave] man belong to many partners disputing with one another [like those who worship more than one god] and a [slave] man belonging to only one man [like those who worsihp only Allah]. Are those two equal in comparison? All the praises are to Allah. Yet most of them knwo not” (al-Zumar 29). “From an Islamic perspective, there is no way for a person to please more than one god as, by the Islamic definition of the word “God”, God must be the thing that is formemost in one’s heart. But what must be even more frustrating is the attempt to please various gods with different needs while claiming to believe that those gods and oneself are actually all one and the same reality.”
In response to this I ask the reader to read again my response concerning the Gods and Goddesses and in particular the quote by Sivaya Subramuniyaswami.
Also see the discussion on Brahman. Zarabozo does not understand that the Supreme Consciousness is expressed through all things. Essentially worshipping a particular aspect is worshipping the Infinite. Some Hindus don’t even do outward worship, but instead tune inward through Raja Yoga.
I will again quote Sivaya Subramuniyaswami from the same book
“The stone or metal Deity images are not mere symbols of the Gods; they are the form through which their love, power and blessings flood forth into this world. We may liken this mystery to our ability to communicate with others through the telephone. We do not talk to the telephone; rather we use a telephone as a means of communication with another person who is perhaps thousands of miles away. Without the telephone, we could not converse across such distances; and without the sanctified murti in the temple or shrine we cannot easily commune with the Deity. His vibration and presence can be felt in the image, and he can use the image as temporary physical-plane body or channel. As we progress in our worship, we begin to adore the image as the Deity’s physical body, for we knwo that He is actually present and conscious in it during puja, aware of our thoughts and feelings and even sensing the pujari’s gentle touch on the metal or stone”
These different images and icons that the Hindus use in their devotions are different aspects of the same Brahman. Through this type of worship the worshipper may perceive that there is no difference between the worshipper and the object of worship. The ego dissolves into the Divine Embrace of the Divine Mother.
Paramhansa Yogananda mentioned a devotee of Bhakti yoga (the type of worship that Zarabozo is criticizing) who was offering flowers to the Deity in form of an image, but instead of offering it to the image he fell into Samadhi (A state of nonduality in which the perceiver and that which is perceived are One) and he threw the flowers on himself offering to himself as he saw that he alone was that worthy of worship.
This seems blasphemous or even silly, but in such a state one realizes the Truth of Existence that ALL IS BRAHMAN. So even worship of different aspects of the Infinite or Supreme Consciousness in idols and forms of Gods and Goddesses can also lead one to total liberation from ego consciousness, and into the endless Supreme Consciousness.
Lastly Zarabozo mentions:
“The vedas, a collection of Hindu writings, stress the torture of the body and the denial of anything that the soul be inclined to. They present the belief in the transmigration of the soul. Thus, Hindus put their bodies through extreme challenges and tests to remove what they have done in the past and what they may do in the future life. Even death is not a rescue or an escape as it simply implies the moving to another body and going through the same tpe of process over again.”
Unfortunately Zarabozo is just not getting it. It is true that some ascetics go through extreme asceticism in self denial of the body, however one cannot paint all hindus with the same brush. It is true that Yogis teach students how to close themselves from the senses that feed ego consciousness. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this. This is what religion is suppose to be teaching us. It is suppose to teach us how to reach our Highest potential. The reader is urged to read my articles on “Was Muhammad Enlightened?” a set of five articles which demonstrate that Muhammad was more concerned with teaching people to fulfill their desires instead of transcending them.
Many yogis teach westerners and others alike the classic science of Kriya Yoga to obtain union with the Infinite, and do not subject their students to body torture. Zarabozo is just being true to the Salafi Sect of Islam in disparaging other groups without knowledge.
As far as reincarnation, through meditation, karma yoga, raja yoga, and other ways one can obtain liberation from it. He is wrong to think that one is forever bound by it. If he finds reincarnation to be a little silly, one may think also that the Islamic view that one is basically dead in their graves being tortured by angels or shown paradise if they are believers, and then on some day in the far future Allah will ressurect mankind in their body (we wonder why they have to return to their physical bodies, which shows that Islam teaches attachment to the lower self) and are judged. Reincarnation a belief that many around the world hold, is not so silly if you realize that we are not bodies with a soul, but we are soul’s with a body. If we are not our bodies, than the body is just like a piece of clothing that we change.
In conclusion I would really urge Mr. Zarabozo to do more studies on Hinduism and some of the other faiths that he bashed in his works. I would also suggest the reader to check out once again my series of articles on “Was Muhammad Enlightened” to see the reality of Islam and that of Muhammad.
OM

